An $8 million new public works facility and an expanded effort to spruce up city parks and the aquatic center are the main reasons for Papillion's proposed 11 percent property tax increase.
Residents will be able to weigh in on the city's 2011-12 budget at a hearing Tuesday. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. at Papillion City Hall.
Mayor David Black and City Administrator Dan Hoins have recommended Papillion boost the tax rate from 40.5 cents to 45 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.
The owner of a $150,000 home in Papillion would pay $675 next year in city property taxes — up $67 — if the budget is approved.
Overall, the proposal would maintain the city's current staff of about 165 full-time employees and provide raises. The budget also calls for $2 million for unspecified economic development efforts and $250,000 for a new dump truck.
But those expenditures, city officials said, are not driving the proposed tax hike.
Instead, the public works project accounts for most of the proposed increase. It includes an 18,000-square-foot maintenance garage, another 17,000-square-foot public works building and additional storage for road salt. A 2008 engineering consultant's study recommended Papillion acquire 8 to 12 acres for the site.
The new complex would replace the current downtown facility, which was built in 1920. It has three bays to service the city's fleet of 170 vehicles and heavy equipment. The bays are not large enough for fire trucks, city spokesman Darren Carlson said.
"We would invite anyone to come down and take a look at the facility we have," Carlson said. "It is not adequate for the demands."
The property tax hike would pay only a small portion of the total construction cost. Papillion probably would issue bonds, which would have to be repaid over time.
In addition, a portion of the tax hike would go toward park and swimming pool improvements. The city budget proposes about $300,000 to repair and renovate the Papio Bay Aquatic Center and $200,000 for park restoration, particularly Hickory Hill Park.
Councilman Brian Liesveld said he has gotten an earful from his constituents and plans to vote against the proposed budget.
He does not support the idea of raising taxes for the public works complex.
"This seems like too much all at once," Liesveld said. "There is no question the building needs to be replaced, but I would prefer to see us plan ahead and save up. With the way the economy is, I don't think now is the time we should be raising our taxes on our citizens."
Liesveld urged residents to attend the public hearing to make their feelings known.
Council President Steve Engberg said he's leaning toward supporting the mayor's recommended tax hike. Engberg recalled that Papillion's tax rate was much higher in the late 1980s when he was the city's police chief and noted that Papillion's tax rate has recently been the lowest for cities in Douglas and Sarpy Counties.
"We've got a track record of not socking it to people with city taxes," Engberg said.
Contact the writer: 402-444-1056, [email protected]
Copyright ©2011 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.
20 Comments
Posted by: offthecliff on 08/15/11 @ 12:33 pm:
awesome that one of the most conservative parts of the metro area is one of the highest taxed
Posted by: Tea Party Tom on 08/15/11 @ 12:35 pm:
This seems like a fair tax increase and the money is going for good causes. I can support this modest tax increase.
Tom
Posted by: Ed R. on 08/15/11 @ 2:41 pm:
Suttle starts the restaurant tax, now an 11% property tax increase! Incredible.
Posted by: YUP on 08/15/11 @ 2:56 pm:
This has nothing to do with Suttle...
Keep cutting Education spending and soon nobody will be able to read.
Posted by: duh on 08/15/11 @ 3:00 pm:
Suttle has nothing to do with this... this is Papillion, not Omaha.
Posted by: LB on 08/15/11 @ 3:03 pm:
Where is all the money going from Shadow Lake Mall?
Posted by: Overtaxed on 08/15/11 @ 3:26 pm:
Despite all the good things happening in Papillion, an 11% increase in the current economy is not appropriate. Look at the vacant property along 84th Street, in both Papillion and La Vista. How many of those 170 vehicles are in the shop on any given day? How about a cooperative effort between Papillion, La Vista and Sarpy County to reduce costs on all 3?
Posted by: Undertaxed on 08/15/11 @ 3:56 pm:
We must have all revenue to distribute equally to all.
Posted by: Rs on 08/15/11 @ 3:58 pm:
Let's be more specific on raises......seems like alot of "unspecified" money could be better accounted for....plus some day it would be nice to not have such horrible water in this town!!! Also....is this building going to be put next to the Police Station....please deduct the cost of City owned property from the cost. Plus Please Mr. Engberg...you were fired as police chief, your accountability there is a little tainted.......
Posted by: Excuse me? on 08/15/11 @ 4:04 pm:
Okay, so the public works guys need a new building. If that building was built in 1920 it probably does need to be replaced. But why can't we save up money over time to do so? Did they just become aware of this buildings condition now?
Posted by: ****** tax money on 08/15/11 @ 4:26 pm:
250k for a dump truck, sorry, go to actions and get a good one for under 100k, Sorry in these times we need to use our heads, how about adding onto the back of the building for now, when things get better, then build someplace else. pay raises for the 165 people working, nope, they should be thankfull they have a job. wake up. higher fuel, food,education, the never ending taxes that keep going up are bad and getting worse with the kick backs for the few that work for the goverment, paid for by the people. be smart about this if you want to keep your job.
Posted by: Ed R. on 08/15/11 @ 4:31 pm:
Didn't I just read that they want to spend over $8 million on a new water park?
Posted by: Jan on 08/15/11 @ 5:33 pm:
The 11percent tax inxrease is horrible.groceries, insurance,uti;lites have gone up[. Social security has not gone up. who cares if the parks are spotless? Who cares if the road sides arent short? Seems everyone is cutting back except the city of Pappilion Where are the taxes from Shadow Lake and Market point????? Seems that these dont even exist. Mr. Engerg, you really arent accountab;le for anything and Hoins should have been fired long ago.
Posted by: Ed R on 08/15/11 @ 6:37 pm:
I think if Papillion thought outside the box like LaVista did and built a couple of golf courses, they could attract golfers from around the area to their city to golf and shop afterwards. Think of all the money they could bring in to LOWER taxes not RAISE them.
Posted by: DE on 08/15/11 @ 8:24 pm:
Papillion is currently losing money on their golf courses. Bad idea.
Posted by: noclutch on 08/15/11 @ 9:03 pm:
only in papillion, will cost me around $300.00 more per year! maybe that can park there Tahoe's in
there.
Posted by: noclutch on 08/15/11 @ 9:07 pm:
only in the fifth best city in the usa.
Posted by: Ed R. on 08/15/11 @ 9:34 pm:
Didn't Papillion just build a new hockey arena? Those things are expensive, no wonder they need to raise taxes with this and the restaurant tax.
Posted by: mat on 08/15/11 @ 10:45 pm:
what a great time to raise taxes! this will help to knock Papillion out of the best places to live as many will start looking to other places around the metro to move- i know we will- encourage growth of businesses and keep the taxes low- how can the pool not produce enough income to make repairs for itself-
Posted by: Amy on 08/16/11 @ 1:10 pm:
Well. This makes my house hunting a little easier. *crosses Papillion off the list*